logo and link to homepage

My View

Link to Homepage
Link to Introduction Page
Link to Advantages Page
Link to Disadvantages Page
Link to Article Review
Link to Critical Opinion Page
Link to Personal Opinion Page
Link to Web Review Page
Link to Useful Links Page
Link to Feedback Page
Link to Bibliography Page

Logo

Logo

 

Logo

 

 

Logo

 

Logo

 

Logo

Does technology change, enhance, reduce or operate in irrelevance to learning?

“The intellectual nourishment of reading books is so deeply ingrained in our assumptions that it is hard to contemplate a different viewpoint. But the problem with judging new cultural systems on their own terms is the presence of the recent past”
Johnson, S (2005)

So are computer games educational?

  • As indicated by the content of previous pages, research into the benefits or otherwise of computer game usage is one of the most widely contested issues within the education sector. However much of this data is conflicting and contradictory, in reality, despite a massive amount of research, there is no conclusive evidence that the use of computer games in education has a positive or negative effect upon learning.

  • When discussing computer games I think it is vitally important to acknowledge that not all games are the same. All computer games vary massively in terms of their style, content and subject matter. Subsequently, it is logical to assume that some games will have greater educational potential than others. I concur with the view Clarke (2003) that some “computer games can distract from learning” but overall I feel that computer games have the potential to become an incredibly versatile learning tool.

  • The evidence contained within this site would seem to suggest that complex games, in particular, can help to enhance cognitive processing and strategic thinking as well as promoting basic computer literacy skills. In essence, I believe that computer games have the potential to engage pupils in a way that traditional classroom activities simply cannot.

  • It is difficult to ignore claims that; “excessive time spent gaming could negatively impact on schoolwork (Griffiths 1996) Indeed, I am inclined to agree with Stoll (1999) that often; “time spent in front of a screen could instead be spent, engaged in a social activity.” However, I believe moderation is the key to success. I would argue that any activity, if done to excessive levels ,to the determent of all other activities, is likely to have an equally negative impact upon schoolwork and socialisation.

  • Computer games are often criticised for being too passive and encouraging prolonged periods of physical inactivity. I do fear that some games which are highly motivational can become addictive and lead to isolation. However, the same accusation could be levelled at books, indeed in many ways reading is a far more sedentary occupation than gaming. The only distinction perhaps, is that the act of reading is deemed to be far more socially acceptable and culturally valuable.

  • The popularity of commercial computer games would seem to suggest that they appeal to people from a wide range of age groups, cultures, abilities and social backgrounds. Yet despite the obvious appeal and popularity they remain surprisingly underutalised within the classroom environment.

  • It is natural to fear that which you do not understand. I suspect that computer games are such a fundamental component of youth culture, that there is a reluctance on the part of older generations, namely those in positions power and influence, to truly consider their learning potential I believe that if education sector is to develop software that truly appeals to young people and has a positive impact on their education; it must first seek a greater understanding of gaming culture.

  • It is important to acknowledge that the generation of pupils currently being educated within our schools is a computer literate generation that has grown up in an age of sophisticated digital computer games. I acknowledge that there must be safeguards to protect impressionable young children

  • For example, it would be entirely inappropriate to use within the classroom any game that reinforced negative stereotypes or encouraged socially unacceptable behaviours such as violence and aggression. However, if we are truly to harness the educational potential of technology, we must develop games which meet the sophisticated needs and expectations of the gaming generation.

  • I believe that commercial computer games may indeed have the potential to encourage behaviours such as strategic decision-making and memory skills. Unfortunately, traditional ‘educational games’ are relatively unsophisticated. Subsequently, pupils do not feel challenged and become quickly disillusioned, thus they are given little opportunity to develop such skills.

  • I believe educators must cooperate and collaborate with the commercial games industry to gain better understand gaming culture and ensure that the software they develop is capable of engaging pupils and sustaining their interest. There must also be a concerted effort to address the gender bias within the industry and develop games that appeal to both male and female gamers.

  • If they are to be successful it is vital that the next generation of educational games is based upon the same features as successful commercial games. For example, they must be highly interactive and incorporate the principles of both risk and reward. Regrettably, to develop a range of educational games as sophisticated and complex as those available in the commercial sector would require a massive investment of time, money and resources. Such an ambitious endeavor would require a coalition between education, industry and politics, which I fear is highly unlikely.

E mail
17 March, 2006

Disclaimer